1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part partially modified as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be corrected;

A. On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “fluoral change” in the second page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “fluoral change limited liability company”, each “8,360,000 dollars” in the third page 19 and 4 column 8 shall be deemed to read “8,630,000 dollars”, “1, 2013.10” in the fourth page 10 shall be deemed to read “1, 2013,” “4, 18, and 21 column 4, 14, 18, and 21 shall be deemed to read “fluoral construction”, “45,00,000” in the fourth page 4 column, “Plaintiff and Defendant” in the fourth page 9 shall be deemed to read “investment and trade, etc., for each business purpose”, respectively.

B. Each entry of the evidence No. 16 of the first instance judgment No. 16 of the first instance judgment is as follows: “A evidence No. 32-1, 2, 3, 4, and 33 of the evidence No. 32-1, 3, and Party A’s testimony”; “A’s testimony of the witness of the first instance trial” of the first instance judgment No. 7 shall be added to “the entry of the evidence No. 6 and the witness of the first instance trial”; “the testimony of the witness of the first instance trial” of the first instance judgment No. 5 of the seventh and the “each entry of the evidence No. 20-1 through 38 of the evidence No. 20-1 of the evidence No. 8”.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.