beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.
Defendant
A does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 6, 2011, Defendant A, at the Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and at the Kimpo-si, Defendant A knew of the fact that he/she committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by running an illegal speculative act in the absence of a mutual game room in C, D, and E’s first floor below the F of Kimpo-si (hereinafter “F Game Center”). However, on October 1, 2011, the Defendant entered into with C with C as if he/she was a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment. However, on the same day, he/she would pay a fine in lieu of a fine, if he/she was sentenced to a fine, and would be subject to detention, and would be paid in 3 million won per month according to the reduction period, and submitted the above game room to Kimpo-si, an unemployment guard, such as a lessee’s lease contract.
As a result, the defendant got the criminal to escape according to C's teachers.
2. Defendant B, around November 6, 201, at the Kimpo-dong, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and the fact was known that the Defendant committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment by jointly operating a game room with no trade name on the first and second floor of Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “I Game Center”). However, on October 201, the Defendant entered into a contract with Defendant B with Defendant B with “300,000 won per day of the head of the branch office, 30,000 won per day, and 30,000 won for the payment if it is erroneous,” pursuant to the “bol Agreement” with the effect that “I will pay for the 30,000,000 won for the head of the branch office,” the Defendant stated to the Justice of the Kimpo-si, as he operated the game room, and made an interrogation of the same contents as a suspect, etc. during the investigation process.
As a result, the defendant got the criminal to escape according to C's teachers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects against the Defendants (including the cross-examination)
1. C and E.