logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.09.24 2014고정1234
범인도피
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 17, 2013, the Defendant appealed for eight months in the Daejeon District Court for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Fraudulent Acts, etc., but is dismissed and the sentence becomes final and conclusive on June 11, 2013.

B From 09:00 on May 14, 2012 to 17:30 on May 15, 2012, the Defendant employed the Defendant who will work as an employee, E, F, and run a business in Daejeon-gu, within the game room without a trade name of the 6th class D located in Daejeon-gu, and set up 40 games “marine open game machine (the 30th class, the 10th unit of the 2nd class)”, which is a speculative electronic recreation device, in the game room. The game room was found by the customers to find the game room, by inserting the 10,00 won of the 10,00 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the 10,000 won of the fee.

B, while engaging in the game room business as above, around 17:30 on May 15, 2012, the Defendant, the president of the Daejeon District Police Station, who was the head of the District Police Station, asked the Defendant to make a statement as the actual owner of the game room in order to conceal the fact that he operated the game room business, and caused the Defendant to make a false confession.

On May 15, 2012, around 19:52, the Defendant made a false statement to the police officer in charge of the above game room business in the Daejeon Middle-gu Police Station and the office building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building building

As a result, the defendant got the criminal defendant to escape B who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of judgment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the interrogation protocol of each prosecution as to B;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Detention at a workhouse;

arrow