logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.01 2019나2053618
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

Article 756(1) of the Civil Act provides that “A person who is obligated to perform his/her duty” of the first instance judgment shall be deemed to be “(the plaintiff claims that this court added his/her name holder’s liability under Article 24 of the Commercial Act and the employer’s liability under Article 756(1) of the Civil Act to the second and third preliminary claim, but all of the above arguments were withdrawn on May 8, 2020.”

On the 6th of the judgment of the first instance, the term "small" shall be read as "preparation".

In the 8th judgment of the first instance, the following two acts shall be deemed to be “at the request”.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow