logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2018나85633 (1)
보험금
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows each evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance can be recognized as legitimate.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal in paragraph (2). Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As to the part of the first instance judgment, the two pages 16 to 18 of the two pages of the first instance judgment are as follows: “The plaintiffs are all the legal successors of the deceased G (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”); the Defendants are all the insurers who concluded the driver’s insurance contract with the deceased as the insured.”

The 13,700 won per month in the third and second parallel judgments of the first instance shall be deemed to be “14,000 won per month”; the 6th parallel’s “14,000 won per month” shall be deemed to be “13,700 won per month”; and the 7th parallel’s “K” shall be deemed to be “N”.

1.-In the fourth bottom of the judgment of the first instance, “traffic injury (accidents set forth below during the insurance period) for a driver” shall be read as “traffic injury to a driver (referring to any bodily injury inflicted upon a driver due to an accident set forth below during the insurance period),”

1. (3) The phrase “traffic accidents, such as collision, contact, explosion, etc. of motor vehicles and other means of transport” in paragraph (3) shall be understood as “traffic accidents such as collision, contact, fire, explosion, etc. of motor vehicles and other means of transport”.

The phrase “instant truck” on the 5th page of the judgment of the first instance refers to the “H vehicle (2.5 tons dump truck, hereinafter “instant truck”) owned by the network, and the same side [based on recognition] of “B” as “B Nos. 1 through 3, 6, 8, 9, 10” among “B”.

The 8th half of the judgment of the first instance, “Nos. 1 and 5” is “A No. 1, 2, and 5,” and “A around December 6, 2016,” each of the 7th parallels, “B around December 5, 2016,” and “report on the occurrence of safety” in the same 10 parallels, respectively.

arrow