Of the judgment of the first instance, the defendant (Counterclaim defendant) shall be paid in excess of 610,123,896 won to the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant).

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the case where the defendant newly rendered a new argument in this court, and is further determined in paragraph 2.

(The main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). On the 3rd day, the Defendant (the former trade name: G Co., Ltd.) and the Defendant with the fourth four pages “Defendant” are all “Co., Ltd.”.

Under 3, “1,739/1,739/1,739/1,739/1,739/1,00 (hereinafter “the instant land before division”) of five to six lanes” are “1,739/1,739/1,739/1,00 of the instant land before division (hereinafter “the instant land before division”).

3 Under 3, the term "the defendant" shall be read as "the above sales contract".

The 4th five to six parallels “I paid 68,250,000 won for down payment on August 10, 2006.” The I paid 68,250,000 won for down payment on August 10, 2006.”

Under the 4th page, “land has been expropriated” means “each land (hereinafter “land acquired through consultation”) has been completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each land,” and “compensation for expropriation from Pyeongtaek-si” in the same conduct shall be deemed “purchase price for acquisition through consultation from Pyeongtaek-si on May 25, 2017.”

The 5th six parallels “whether it was designated as a land transaction contract permission area on August 26, 2008” are as follows: “At the time of the conclusion of the instant contract, it was already designated as a land transaction contract permission area.”

5 Under the 5th page, “B evidence 22-1, 2” shall be added to “based grounds for recognition” of 9-10.

Under 5, the term "compensation for expropriation of the expropriated land (541m2, K 49m2)" shall be deemed as "sale price received as a consultation acquisition".

6 The 6th parallel 3 to 7th parallel part shall be as follows:

“A) If one of the parties to a contract for the land within the land transaction permission zone alleged in the first claim, expresses his/her intention to refuse the performance of the obligation to cooperate in the application for land transaction permission.