A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2, 2015, at around 00:10, the Defendant reported 112 that he was a brue who frighter in front of the “D” operated by C, which had been under the influence of alcohol on the front of the “D” road operated by C, and had been urged from the slopeF belonging to the Busan Coastal Police Station Edistrict, Busan, for the Defendant to return home, “I reported brue, whether he reported brue, whether he was a restaurant and a fluor, brue, brue, police brue, and brue”.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report handling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and C

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter the reason for sentencing) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] When the scope of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties is minor (one month to eight months), the mitigation area (one month to eight months), and the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme (the decision of sentence] of the defendant committed the crime of this case by drinking as a primary offender, the social relation is clear, the social relation is deeply divided, and his mistake is in depth, and is against it, the sentence of the same order shall be imposed in consideration of all the circumstances.