1. The defendant 32,865,50 won to the plaintiff A, 46,59,450 won to the plaintiff B, 24,171,200 won to the plaintiff C, and 51,186.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) A project approval and public announcement, etc. - Project name: An urban planning facility project (M project): A project operator: the head of the National Defense Facility Headquarters under the defendant - A public announcement of project approval: N publicly notified on July 15, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “public announcement of project approval in this case”);

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation on April 13, 2017 - The objects of expropriation: The same shall apply to each object of expropriation indicated in the table of the objects of expropriation in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each object of expropriation in this case”).

(In the case of Plaintiff K, the Plaintiff asserted the business loss compensation for the business with the trade name of “P” in the Seocho-si, but in the adjudication of expropriation, the Plaintiff K's business was limited to the compensation for losses and relocation expenses for obstacles to the place of business on the ground that the business is not subject to the business loss compensation). - The date of commencement of expropriation: June 6, 2017.

Ruling of the Central Land Tribunal on October 26, 2017 - Compensation for losses by an objection: The details of compensation in attached Table 2 shall be as specified in the attached Table 2.

(원고 K의 경우 이의재결에서도 영업손실보상은 인정되지 아니하였다. 위 원고는 영업장소의 지장물에 관한 손실보상금 및 이전비 보상금에 관하여는 증액을 구하고 있지 아니하므로 이에 관한 이의재결 손실보상금은 별도로 표시하지 아니한다). - 감정평가법인 : ㈜Q, ㈜R

D. The court appraiser S’s appraisal result (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - The court appraiser’s appraisal result (hereinafter “court appraiser”) - With respect to the land among each subject matter of expropriation of this case (hereinafter “each of the subject matter of expropriation of this case”), the court appraiser of this case (hereinafter “each of the subject matter of expropriation of this case”) selected land of this case as a comparative land of 1,586 square meters, U-U.S., 3,061 square meters, 516 square meters, 516 square meters, 595 square meters, and WW large 95 square meters, and compared the regional factors and individual factors with each of the subject land of this case.