1. The Defendant’s KRW 69,247,80 and KRW 12,293,200 among the Plaintiff and KRW 56,954,60 from March 14, 2017.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

(a) Business authorization and public notice - Business name: Private investment project (B; hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): The concessionaire: the head of the Seoul Regional Construction and Management Administration- the head of the Seoul Regional Construction and Management- the public announcement of project approval under the Defendant: C public notice by the Ministry of Land

B. 1) The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s ruling on expropriation (1) February 9, 2017 - Subject matter of expropriation (related to compensation for losses of the subject matter of expropriation): Over ,00 Dodong prior to subdivision (hereinafter “Ddong”).

E 1,664 square meters per 1,664 square meters per 2016

8. The Plaintiff’s share of 590/814 square meters in F field, which is a land to be expropriated, was divided into 836 square meters in E field, 836 square meters in F field, and 828 square meters in total, and only the Plaintiff’s share of 590/814 square meters in F field, among which the land to be expropriated, was the subject matter

(2) Around September 7, 2017, the date of expropriation (related to the compensation for the decline in the price of the remaining land of this case) - A decision of dismissal was made on the ground that there was no fall in the price of the remaining land of this case. - A certified public appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Appraisal corporation”) and a resolution of dismissal was made on the ground that the remaining land of this case did not fall in the price of the remaining land of this case. - A decision of dismissal was made on the grounds that the Plaintiff asserted a fall in the price of the remaining land of this case.

A person shall be appointed.

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on July 20, 2017 (based on the plaintiff’s objection to the compensation for expropriation of the object of expropriation of this case) - The adjudication on compensation for losses: 491,790,800 won - The appraisal corporation and the resolution of the resolution of the conflict of interest and the resolution of the resolution of the settlement of disputes

D. The court appraiser K’s appraisal results (hereinafter the above appraiser’s appraiser’s “court appraisal”) and the court appraiser’s appraisal (hereinafter the above appraiser’s appraisal “court appraisal”) shall (1) select the land to be expropriated as a comparative standard for calculating the compensation for losses with respect to the subject matter of expropriation in the instant case (specific use area: development-restricted area, natural green belt, and current use status: Before and after the development-restricted area, natural green belt, road traffic: length (a) and road traffic: 480,000 square meters: 480,000 square meters: 1.796).