logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.11.18 2015고정1604
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was elected as a representative at the time of the establishment of a district redevelopment and rearrangement project association (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project association”). However, on May 25, 201, the Defendant resided in Seoul E, other than the business area of the redevelopment project association of this case, and was retired ipso facto from the representatives in accordance with the articles of incorporation of the redevelopment project association of this case, and the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) is a specialized management entity that entered into a service contract with the redevelopment project association of this case.

1. On July 3, 2015, the Defendant drafted a printed article “in relation to the convocation of the board of representatives” at an office in the office in the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu office located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, stating that the victimized company participated in the meeting of the association and led or obstructed the meeting by mobilization of the OS staff, etc. even though the victimized company did not interfere with the fairness of the union resolution, the Defendant: (a) stated that “To that end, there was a fact that the general meeting resolution (voting, etc.) was not made fairly due to the involvement of the maintenance company (C) and the mobilization of the OS staff, etc.; (b) made it necessary for the maintenance company (C) to make a prior decision to suspend the election or the involvement of the general meeting; and (c) requested for the convocation of the board of representatives; and (c) thereafter, the said printed article was sent by mail to the F and

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victimized company by openly pointing out false facts.

2. 모욕 피고인은 2015. 7. 13. 21:40경 불상지에서 인터넷사이트 다음(daum)의 이 사건 재개발조합 까페(G)에 접속하여, 까페 자유게시판에 “H”라는 제목 하에, “개가 주인을 물어뜯으려 대들듯이, 머슴이 밥 먹여준 주인에게 겁을 주어, 용역업체가 주인행세를 하려는 격입니다.”, "저는 이번 기회에 선량한 우리 조합원들을 향해 우격다짐, 윽박질로 밀어붙이기식...

arrow