Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

A housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership in the E area (hereinafter referred to as "development partnership") is a corporation that obtained authorization for the establishment of a partnership on January 11, 2012 and completed the registration of the establishment of a partnership on January 24, 2013 (the head of the current partnership, the size of 163,168 square meters, the number of units of construction: 3,585 square meters, the number of members: 2,605). G is an employee of the rearrangement project who is deemed public official as an employee of the H-affiliated project management company in charge of the administrative affairs of the redevelopment partnership, and the first is the representative of the K-A-A-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B-B

G In the process of selecting a collaborative company for the authorization of the establishment of a partnership on January 11, 2012, after the authorization was granted for the establishment of a partnership, G was in close friendship with M et al. on the ground that it was difficult for M et al to smoothly proceed with the project due to disputes between the parties to the so-called “Emergency Countermeasure Committee” that is the president of the partnership, N et al., a general director of the partnership, or the group of partnership enforcement and redevelopment.

I introduced the dispute against M, while I mediated the dispute against M, received rebates in return for the selection of partner companies and their partner companies, and G intended to handle all the administrative affairs of the union so that internal companies can be finally selected.

1. The Defendants’ bid interference, G, and I must select a collaborative company in a fair manner through open bidding, but they voluntarily set the K and the K and the K, which are associated with a business owner or directly or indirectly with the operation of the redevelopment cooperative. From January 2013 to February 2, 2013, the Defendants agreed with the redevelopment cooperative upon the bidding qualification conditions in advance with the Defendants, and notified the Defendants of the bid for the redevelopment cooperative, and selected the so-called so-called “r” company to participate in the bidding, and the Defendants are friendly to receive the qualification conditions from I and G.