logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2020.11.12 2020고단988
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.

Seized evidence 1 to 7 shall be confiscated.

The defendant is an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The term "2020 High-Ma988" is a person who solicits, manages, and instructs to commit a crime, the term "cash collection" and "transfer liability" as the total liability of the so-called "Sishing" fraud organization that commits a fraudulent act by misrepresenting an unspecified number of victims by calls to a financial institution and the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service while misrepresenting him/her in connection with the loan.

On April 16, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a mobile phone name scaming staff member (hereinafter “G” in the indictment of the E company F; (b) it appears to be a clerical error; (c) thus, corrected; (d) the head of the team misrepresentation) to the effect that “the claim recovery service is performed; (c) daily salary class 1.80,000 won and other expenses are paid; (d) the Defendant assumes the victims of telephone financial fraud at the bank or the staff of the Financial Supervisory Service in accordance with the instructions of the aforementioned person’s name, and agreed to commit the crime against the victims by taking part in the “written collection and remittance” of the E company’s name scaming fraud fraud, which was directly received from the victims, and which was carried out the role of remitting to the account designated by the victims.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 23, 2020, the person who was unaware of the name of fraud and attempted fraud made a false statement to the victim H, namely, misrepresentation of the J of the Triest Branch of the I Bank by telephoneing the victim H, and “Maspppp loan is available up to KRW 50 million. It is reasonable to repay the most remaining loans out of the existing loans, and it is possible to grant a loan.”

However, in fact, the above person was not an employee of a financial company, and only for the crime of Bophishing fraud, but did not have the intent or ability to provide a loan to the victim as agreed even if the victim received the money from the victim.

The above-mentioned person who was named as the victim is the victim.

arrow