logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2020.02.04 2019고단1260
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Samsung Tallon 5 (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with the staff members of the Bosing Organization, who are named in the name Bag Ad’s name (the suspension of indictment on December 19, 2019; hereinafter the same shall apply) using the telegram Ad’s name (the suspension of indictment, etc.) and conspired with the Defendant to instruct the victim to transfer money to another non-disscriptive employee (the collection d) by telephone to the victim and to transfer money to another non-scriptive employee (the collection d), by making the victim misrepresenting that he/she would buy a low interest rate loan to the victim by telephone, and to transfer the money to another non-scriptive employee (the collection d), and then to transfer the money to another non-scriptive employee.

1. On November 28, 2019, the false statement stating that “Around November 28, 2019, a person who was unaware of the name of the defrauded’s staff member was not an E bank employee, but a victim F is allowed to provide loans at low interest” by leaving the phone to the designated place by inserting KRW 5,700,000 in the white envelope. The victim was granted KRW 5,700,000 from the first floor of the office in Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and transferred the same day to the designated place by inserting KRW 5,70,000,000 from the victim’s account number, and the Defendant received the said KRW 5,700,000 from the victim’s personal account number, and received KRW 73,100,000 from the victim to December 2, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the employees of the scaming operations in sequential order, by deceiving the victims, and by receiving money from the victims.

2. On December 3, 2019, the name and non-scamist of the attempted phishing operator’s name and non-scam on or around December 3, 2019 is not an E bank employee but a victim B by telephone despite the absence of intent or ability to make a loan, and “if the loan is ultimately granted, it is necessary to obtain approval from the chief of the department and one year for the amount approved for the loan

arrow