1. The Defendant’s KRW 387,060,082 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 31, 2015 to December 13, 2018, and the following.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) B: (a) drive C C C C C C at around 15:10 on July 31, 2015, and driving the two-lanes of the parallel line located at the point 197km in Busan Busan Highway onto the one-lane road due to an unforeseen cause while driving the two-lanes from the wind side to the Daegu-gu bank; and (b) the Plaintiff driven the two-lanes on the part of the Plaintiff, while driving the two-lanes from the wind side, and driving the two-lanes into the one-lane road due to an unforeseen cause.

) On the upper right side of the vehicle, the back side of the body-to-side left side of the vehicle stopped towards the direction towards the side, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle stopped on the two-lanes (hereinafter “on the front side”).

(2) At around 15:16 on July 31, 2015, E driven a passenger car with a F highest speed (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) and driven at the said median speed, followed by the speed limit (100km per hour), and obstructed the Plaintiff on the front side of the Defendant vehicle, with the duty of care to prevent the accident due to the booming on the front side, while exceeding the speed limit and neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident due to the smoke, while driving the vehicle on the front side, and driving the vehicle on the two-lanes due to the Defendant vehicle due to the negligence of operating the vehicle on the front side, and then discovered the Plaintiff on the front side of the Defendant vehicle at late.

As a result, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as blood transfusions under the margin of 20 weeks, chilling of livers, and spathal spathal of spatha, etc.

(3) The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract for the defendant's vehicle (hereinafter "the accident in this case"). The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract for the defendant's vehicle (based on recognition), the evidence Nos. 1 through 8, Eul evidence No. 1 (each of the descriptions, images, and arguments including each number).

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as an insurer of defendant vehicle.

C. According to the above evidence, the Plaintiff’s prior accident is examined.