1. The Defendant’s KRW 196,464,644 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from June 27, 2016 to May 19, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) C: (a) around 02:00 on June 27, 2016, D7.5 tons of cargo vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)

ii) having driven the E-Ad vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Add vehicle”) while driving approximately 13 km points in the direction of Ansan of the national highway No. 88-8, 39, e.g., e., e., e., e., e. e., e. e., e. e. e. (hereinafter referred to as “Ad vehicle”).

(B) In order to replace the left side of the vehicle, the said vehicle stopped across the two-lanes of the road and the side of the road, and did not avoid F and G on the two-lanes of the road, and shocked them into the right side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) G (hereinafter “the deceased”) died around 20:43 on the same day due to the instant accident.

3) The Plaintiff as a dependent of the Deceased’s father inherited the Deceased solely, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business operator who entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle. 【The fact that there is no dispute over grounds for recognition, Gap’s evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Gap’s evidence No. 9-5 and six

B. According to the above recognition of liability, as the deceased died due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant is liable to compensate the deceased and the Plaintiff for the damages incurred as a mutual aid business operator of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring special circumstances.

C. At the time of limitation of liability, street lights were not installed in the vicinity of the point where the instant accident occurred, and part of the Aridi vehicle was parked in two lanes, and thus, the deceased, as the towing vehicle, had been able to keep out of the safe place until the arrival of the towing vehicle and have been able to take adequate safety measures against the latter vehicle, but was negligent in assisting the replacement work and assist the replacement work on the two-lanes, and such negligence was caused by the Plaintiff’s occurrence and expansion of the instant accident.

However, F and the Deceased are located at the front of 50 meters from the location of the instant accident.