Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was the Chairman of the JJ in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, from September 24, 2012 to October 23, 2012, and Defendant C was the representative director of the same company from September 24, 2012 to November 2012. Defendant B was the managing director of the same company from October 24, 2012 to November 23, 2012.

Defendant

B: (a) On September 2012, 2012, the Defendant A and the Defendant C conspired with the Defendant to receive money from the victim as a security deposit by pretending to have the victim acquire the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right of the 6,7th Mana (hereinafter “the instant right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the right to operate the

Defendant

B In the “O” restaurant operated by the victims of the 1st N in Sung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, on October 2012, 2012, the Court stated that “The victims were members of the JJ and made an investment in the steel company with a large amount of money, and there is a lot of interest in the steel company. It is too re-existent. It is too small that the finance of the above company is sound as if the instant letter of credit was owned by the said company and the instant letter of credit was too clean, and that the letter of credit was owned by the said company.” On October 18, 2012, the Court displayed the letter of credit in this case, along with Defendant C, as if the letter of credit was owned by the said company.

Defendant

B: (a) around October 19, 2012, the victim made a false statement that “I will hold the right to manage the right to manage the loan interest in the public bath by making a deposit to the victim by telephone; (b) I would have the right to receive a collateral security in the first order at each week by making a deposit to the victim; and (c) Defendant A would have the right to obtain a collateral security on the same day.”