logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.10.19 2017고단326
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) leased and operated a hot spring Do Da located in Kimpo-si, and the victim E, respectively, and (b) decided to manage the remaining hot spring Do , store , and store ever operated by the Defendant.

1. On August 20, 2015, the Defendant, at the G Job Placement Office located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul Metropolitan Government) around August 20, 2015, provided that “The Defendant has the right to operate the said G Job Placement Office (D) with the victim’s right to remaining and to operate the said house and store.”

on behalf of the owner of a business shall not enter into a contract unless the owner of the business within

The entire contract shall be entered into in the name of the Republic of Korea and the sub-lease management shall be made for the old and the old and the old.

It stated that the rent deposit shall be 120 million won, which shall be borne by 60 million won and operated.

However, in fact, the lease deposit for the above spawn, South Korea, and the store operation right was 80 million won, and the defendant was paid 60 million won from the damaged party due to the lack of funds or income to be invested, and the defendant was thought to pay the remaining deposit by receiving the deposit from the sub-lessee of the spawn, etc.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was given KRW 60 million under the name of the right to operate a store and store to the third party.

2. Embezzlement;

A. At the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant was requested by the injured party to sublease the remaining sugar, and around that time, the Defendant was given KRW 20 million as the sublease deposit from the sub-lessee H in the name of the sub-lease deposit.

While the defendant kept the above sub-lease deposit for the victim, he embezzled it by paying it to I under the name of the D tax lease deposit to be borne by the defendant at will at that time.

B. The Defendant received a request from the injured party to sublease a shop at the same time and place as Paragraph (1) and received five million won as a sublease deposit from the lessee J around that time.

The defendant is above the victim.

arrow