A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for aiding and abetting the theft at the Seoul Central District Court and 2 years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2017.

On October 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B at a public brokerage office that did not know the trade name before the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Senior Bus Terminal on the first of October 2015, 2015, stating that “The Defendant would set up a collateral security on a private house or building with KRW 100 million as a security deposit for the small credit services of 29,000,000 won outside of C, and pay KRW 100,000 per day in return for the young credit services of 29,000 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any specific property due to bad credit standing with approximately one billion won, and did not have any way to procure funds and bank loans of the victim, but rather did not have any way to purchase the instant E, and the facts charged in the above Sabya by stating the maximum amount of KRW 664 million on the bonds at the above Sabya by “7,80,000 won.” However, according to each certified copy of each register (Evidence 5913, the evidence record No. 5913, the upper part of the 2017 high part) the Defendant appears to have wrong description. Even if the prior mortgage was established and the prior mortgage was paid by the victim, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay 10,000 won per day to the victim or return the deposit.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 100 million from the victim, including KRW 10 million on October 8, 2015, and KRW 90 million on October 12, 2015, from the victim, as a deposit for old services.

[2018 Highest 784] The Defendant: (a) around August 2015, 2015, during the soup and soup period (hereinafter “the soup period”); (b) around E 29 parcels of 29 parcels of e-mail and soup period (hereinafter “the soup period”); (c) the Defendant took the practical owner of the soup period; and (d) the Victim F of the e-mail with a deposit of KRW 60,000,000 for the soup and soup period (the period of the contract on August 2015).