1. The counterclaim Defendant: 14,288,200 won and out of them to the counterclaim Plaintiff;

(a) From July 12, 2016 to July 12, 2016, for KRW 7,888,700.

Basic Facts

On February 17, 2012, the Administrator of the Small and Medium Business Administration publicly announced the "Implementation Plan for Greenization Technology Development Project at Manufacturing Site", and on July 30, 2012, the counterclaim Defendant submitted a business plan for greenization technology development project at manufacturing site (hereinafter "instant project").

Project name: The name of the project subject for on-site greenization technology development project: The total technology development project cost (total 12 months) from November 1, 2012 to October 31, 2013: 307,000,000 (Government contributions 230,000,000,000) shall be paid to the counterclaim Defendant as follows:

The total Government contributions: Article 10 (1) of the Guidelines for the Operation of the Small and Medium Enterprise Technology Development Support Project (Collection of Technology Fees) shall be paid to the counter-party in an amount equivalent to 10% of the Government contributions to the Counterclaim by the means of payment (cash, performance (payment), guaranty insurance, etc.) designated by the counter-party, if any, early completion of the evaluation of Jindo-do or the final evaluation, and successful determination and notification is made pursuant to Articles 27 through 30 of the Guidelines for the Operation of the Support Project for Small and Medium Enterprises Development, and the detailed matters shall be governed by Article 39 of the Guidelines for the Operation of

On November 13, 2012, the counterclaim Defendant entered into an agreement on the instant business with the Counterclaim Plaintiff, a specialized institution for technology promotion, with the following contents.

On May 8, 2014, the Counterclaim Defendant held a final evaluation committee on the basis of the final report submitted by the Counterclaim Defendant, and the final evaluation committee decided the instant business task of the Counterclaim Defendant as a "sexual attack."

On May 14, 2014, the Counterclaim Defendant notified the Counterclaim Defendant of the payment of royalties according to the result of the said determination, and the Counterclaim Defendant was actually the Counterclaim on May 25, 2014.