beta
Text
The sentence against the accused shall be five million won or more.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 29, 2016, around 06:09, the Defendant is taking a F-business taxi operated by the victim E in the D hotel entrance located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant is able to take a 500,000 won per week by burning up to Gwangju Gero-dong.
Having to pay the fees to the residents of the building located in the building located in the building located in the Republic of Korea.
“.....”
However, at the time, the defendant did not have a means to pay taxi charges, such as cash or credit cards, and there was no intention or ability to pay taxi charges to the victim on the ground that there was no fact that the purchaser had to pay the taxi charges.
As above, Defendant 1 made the victim make a false statement, and had the victim operate a taxi for more than 4 hours and 30 minutes from 12,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
The facts charged in this part of the indictment obtained the benefit of property equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 from the taxi charges promised to the victim.
“” However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the objective profit of the Defendant’s property exceeds the aggregate of KRW 264,240 and KRW 285,140,00 of the taxi fare of KRW 264,240 and the expressway tolls of KRW 20,90 by time distance. Thus, to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense, the facts charged are revised
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. E statements;
1. Application of the receipt statute
1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The fact that there are several occasions of punishment for the same kind of crime of several methods similar to the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that the crime during the suspension of execution is a crime during the suspension of execution, the fact that the efforts to recover damage are not observed, and the amount of damage is 2.80,000 won.