logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.10.14 2020고정164
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 02:20 on June 15, 2019, at the street in front of the residence B of the Jeonnam-gun, and (b) went to the Goyang-si Mandong operated by the victim C while having no capacity or intent to pay the fee, and (c) again, had the victim drive approximately 90 km on a 164,600 meters of taxi charges and the highway tolls to the Eup box of the Gu Yan-dong Police Station located in the Jeonnam-dong Eup, and thereafter, corrected as seen above, since it is apparent that the taxi charges and KRW 164,600 on the indictment of KRW 164,6

The amount of property profit was not paid and the amount was equivalent to the same amount of property profit.

2. On June 15, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 07:00 on the 07:00 on the 15th day of 2019, while having no capacity or intent to pay the fare, had the victim F take a G taxi operating approximately 40 km up to the Gu funeral Police Station Eup, which is located in the Gu Funeral Police Station Eup, and did not pay KRW 37,000 on the 37,00,000 on the franchisium.

3. On June 16, 2019, around 22:37, 2019, the Defendant: (a) went on the J-si operated by the victim I while having no capacity or intent to pay the fare; and (b) failed to pay KRW 42,530,00,000 to operate approximately 37 km to the residence of the Y-Gun Y-gun, Jeonnam-gun; and (c) did not pay the taxi fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statement of each victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on taxi expenses, expressway tolls receipts, taxi expense receipts, and taxi receipts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order recognize the instant case, and the amount of damage is relatively minor, and the circumstance where the Defendant is receiving treatment due to the early injury appears to have partly affected the instant case.

arrow