beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 14 million.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On April 9, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Cheongju District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
On December 11, 2019, at around 01:17, the Defendant: (a) driven a car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 300 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.112% in the section from the front of the Gyeonggi-si Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-si, to the roads before the D restaurant located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-si; and (b) driven the car.
Accordingly, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on the actual state of the driver;
1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records, investigation reports (verification of criminal records of the same kind of suspect), summary orders;
1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include: (a) the Defendant re-offending despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to drunk driving; (b) the blood alcohol concentration is not low; and (c) the occurrence of traffic accidents is unfavorable to the Defendant; (d) the Defendant recognizes and seriously reflects the Defendant’s crime; and (e) there is no particular damage due to traffic accidents; (c) the above drinking driving criminal record is the previous offense of a fine; (d) the last criminal record is the previous offense of a fine for 2007; and (e) there is no other criminal record, taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the fact that there