logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.03.12 2019고단7243
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 30, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million at the Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

【Criminal Facts】

At around 19:40 on November 19, 2019, the Defendant driven D K5 car with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.121% under the influence of alcohol from approximately 500 meters from the Do in front of the G apartment in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, to the front road of the same Gu C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Notification of the control of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of previous convictions), and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a defendant's reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the provisional payment order commits a second offense despite the fact that the defendant had been punished once due to drunk driving, traffic accidents have occurred, and blood alcohol level has not been lowered, under the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant. Meanwhile, the defendant's criminal records are recognized and seriously reflects the crime, and the criminal records of the above drunk driving are criminal records, and there are no other criminal records, and there are no minor physical damage, and the defendant's family and branch want to take into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records of this case are considered as follows.

arrow