1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months and by imprisonment for four months; and

2.Provided, That this judgment shall become final and conclusive, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:15 on February 18, 2015, the Defendants expressed that the slope D belonging to the Hongcheon Police Station C commander of Hongcheon Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving a report of traffic accident on the front of the Yancheon apartment, in Hancheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Hancheon-gun, the Hancheon-gun, who was in front of the Hancheon-gun, would ask the Defendants for the circumstances of drinking driving, etc., and Defendant A would like to see the above D’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sher her her sher her her her her her her s his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her hers his her her her her her her her her.

Accordingly, the Defendants interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site and photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to F and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Concurrent Crimes: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (Punishments imposed on the crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties against F, of which the circumstances are heavier);

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter referred to as the reasons for sentencing) is [the scope of recommendation] When the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (the decision of sentence], the extent of violence is minor, the defendants have no same criminal record, there are no criminal records of the suspension of execution or more, and the defendants reflect their depth and depth, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered in light of favorable circumstances.