logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.28 2014고단1935
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5 million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:30 on November 8, 2014, the Defendants of the obstruction of performance of official duties in front of “C” located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and recommended the Defendants to voluntarily act on the land by the guard F of the Cheongju Police Station E Zone, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report that the Defendants are using their body fightings, while leaving the said fightings, Defendant B was on the patrol vehicle. However, Defendant A, as he would in the course of the F, she walked the F on two occasions, she saw the her hand and walked the F due to the development of the her hand, and her desire to write the her hand, and she tried to arrest Defendant A as a flagrant offender for the purpose of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the circumstances leading up to Defendant B’s assault and interfere with Defendant B’s use of the her chest as his hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of reports and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. In the process that the Defendants were arrested as flagrant offenders around the time and time indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and brought in to the E-district of the Cheongju Police Station, the Defendants assaulted G on the knee G knee of the knee of the kne and the knbbbbbbbbbs, etc. on the ground that they were examined separately with the Defendant A, and that the Defendant B was boomed with G on the ground that he was snee of the knee of the knbs.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties related to criminal investigation and global duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.

arrow