1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) indicated the attached drawings No. 1, 2, and 3.

Basic Facts

The reason why the land was divided and the land category was changed before Seopopopopo City, H was inherited by the J on October 30, 1959 while the land was owned by the I after completion of the registration of ownership preservation.

On December 24, 1980, the land before the said subdivision was divided into 2,633 square meters of H forest in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, 1,759 square meters of K forest in Seopo-si, and 1,310 square meters of Lan forest in Seopo-si.

Since then, H forest land 2,633 square meters (hereinafter “H land before division”) was divided into 1,317 square meters of H forest and 1,316 square meters in Seopo-si, Seopopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, and Mapo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

And on April 11, 2019, H 1,317 square meters in Seopo-si was divided into H 405 square meters in Seopo-si and N 912 square meters in Seopo-si in Seopo-si.

On May 14, 2019, the category of H land was changed from “forest” to “building site”.

The J, around August 9, 1974, sold the H land before subdivision to theO, and the ownership transfer registration was completed around August 18, 1981 with respect to the above land.

After November 24, 1987, P sold H land before subdivision to P, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 25, 1987, P donated the land to the Plaintiff on October 14, 1992, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on October 15, 1992.

The Defendants inherited each/6 shares of 1/6 as the J, which owned a 1,310 square meters of L forest (hereinafter “L land”) at Seopopoposi, died on February 21, 1999.

The location and shape of the land H and H land and the location and shape of the L land shall be as specified in the attached Form drawing.

However, among H land, a boundary fence is installed on the part of the ship which connects each point of the attached drawings 1, 2, and c (hereinafter “instant land”) and accordingly, the same drawings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1, which are located on the part of the aforementioned boundary fence, are included in L land and possessed by the Defendants.

[Ground of recognition] Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including paper numbers), and the plaintiff's assertion purport of the whole argument.