logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.16 2017가단5234173
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 51,32,175 to Plaintiff A; KRW 3,00,000 to Plaintiff B; and KRW 700,000 to Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From around 2008, Plaintiff A received treatment with the escape certificate of a conical signboard, and from around 2012, Plaintiff A suffered an incomplete marinction because the root of the right hump has deteriorated.

B. On January 4, 2016, Plaintiff A submitted the result of RoI taken by another hospital on December 28, 2015 to “F Oriental Medical Center” operated by the Defendant to treat radioactive rays, etc. with the data from the results of RoI, which are not through and on the right side of the hospital.

On January 4, 2016, the Defendant diagnosed the Plaintiff’s symptoms as an escape certificate No. 3-4 No. 3-4, 4-5, and 5-1, and conducted physical treatment to the Plaintiff A for 20 minutes after performing physical treatment. After performing physical treatment to the Plaintiff A, the Defendant conducted spawn and spathn therapy.

(hereinafter “instant procedure.” The instant procedure is a method of treating the instant case by directly removing the genes of annual installments using “accomage” in which the end date of intrusion is the end date, with a more active preservation method than ordinary sediment treatment, to reduce the pressure of pests and to improve the bloods surrounding areas.

C. Plaintiff A complained of the left-hand depreciation immediately after the instant treatment, and the Defendant explained to Plaintiff A that it might have been difficult to do so after the lapse of time due to a temporary symptoms that may arise after the instant treatment.

Plaintiff

On January 5, 2015, A, depending on wheel chairss, has a defect that the walking is difficult due to the low-foresting and defluence of both sides, and the Defendant transferred the Plaintiff A to a video medical officer, and had the Plaintiff undergo the MRI inspection. On January 6, 2016, the Defendant conducted the instant treatment twice to the Plaintiff A.

E. Thereafter, the Defendant: (a) on January 26, 2016, to Plaintiff A; (b) on January 3, 2016; (c) on the same year

1. On December 22 of the same year, the fourth procedure was conducted on December 23 of the same year, and the sixth procedure on December 23 of the same year.

F. On December 7, 2016, as a result of the RoI’s inspection, the symptoms of the escape from the Plaintiff A were improved.

arrow