1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff was administered in spine at the hospital located in Pyeongtaek-si C (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), such as high-frequency heat treatment and negotisis in the side signboard, and that the Defendant is a doctor operating the Defendant hospital.

B. At around 13:20 on December 4, 2015, the Plaintiff was performing snow removal work at the construction site, and was going to the Defendant hospital on the same day. 2) On the same day, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the following: (a) as a result of the Defendant hospital’s MRI test at the Defendant hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed: (b) the escape certificate of the conical signboard between the 4-5 and the 2-3-4, and the escape certificate of the conical signboard between the 5-2-3-4, respectively.

On the following day, the Defendant carried out high-frequency heat treatment and non-scopic scoppy (hereinafter “instant first procedure”) on the Plaintiff, and discharged the Plaintiff on the 16th day of the same month.

3) The Plaintiff complained of symptoms that could not properly carry a bridge due to the severe pain on the right side of the lower patrolman of the same month, and the Defendant, as a result of the RoI’s test on the Plaintiff, confirmed that the number of re-sponsive signboards escape from the instant first procedure was confirmed on the part of the instant first procedure. On the 31st of the same month, the Defendant, on the 31st of the same month, filed a high-frequency heat treatment with the Plaintiff.

4) After that, the Plaintiff complained of the hye pain and leg hye symptoms, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed to have damaged the needs of the test and the astronomical roots of the Y in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul. On March 8, 2016, the Defendant implemented the latter vertebrate and the apparatus fixed (hereinafter “instant surgery”) in the latter vertebrate No. 4-5 of the 2016 to the Plaintiff.

C. After treatment, the Plaintiff’s medical records of the Defendant’s situation 1 are recorded as showing symptoms on December 23, 2015, and on December 29, 2015, it is recorded that it is difficult to examine a bridge because there is a certificate of right circulation on the right side, and on December 30, 2015.