logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.01.16 2014고단1373
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) Any person who intends to construct or repair a building on a large scale shall obtain permission from the competent administrative agency;

Nevertheless, the Defendant commenced around September 26, 201, and obtained approval for use on or around February 6, 2012, without obtaining permission for a four-story building of the total floor area of 633.25 square meters in Dong-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, where approval for use was obtained. From April 201 to May 201, 201, the Defendant repaired the apartment house of 14 households of 200.75 square meters in the area of 200.75 square meters into seven households, the five-story households in the area of 197.7 square meters into seven households, and the four-story households in the area of 213.35 square meters into five households, and repaired the apartment house of 19 households into the multi-family house of 19 households.

(b) Where any person intends to extend a building with a total floor area of not more than 85§³, he/she shall report it to the competent administrative agency;

Nevertheless, on June 2012, the Defendant, without filing a report, extended the total floor area of 3.05 square meters in the multi-family house indicated in the above paragraph (a) on the third floor of the multi-family house indicated in the above paragraph (a), and extended the total floor area of 10.20 square meters in total by the same method on the fourth floor.

2. No person who violates the Parking Lot Act shall build or install any facilities without establishing an annexed parking lot, in violation of the provisions of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

Nevertheless, in the process of repairing the multi-family house of 14 households, such as the date and time stated in the above paragraph (1) and at the same place as described in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant did not establish a five-fifths annexed parking lot for the five households added due to large-scale repair, even though it is necessary to install one parking lot for each household.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each illegal building site investigation report;

1. Articles 108(1), 11(1), 111 subparag. 1, and 14 of the Building Act for criminal facts, and Article 29(1) of the Parking Lot Act.

arrow