logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.01.23 2014고단1372
건축법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) Any person who intends to construct or repair a building on a large scale shall obtain permission from the competent administrative agency;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, upon obtaining a building permit on June 30, 2009 and obtaining approval for use on or around December 23, 2009, did not obtain permission for a three-story building of the total floor area of 329.63 square meters in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Incheon with the approval of use on or around December 23, 2009, made two-story households of 113.4 square meters in a size of 113.4 square meters in a size of 113.4 square meters in a way such as removing the door of school living room, building walls, and building separate entrances during the period from January 2, 2010 to February 20 of the same year, and repaired the multi-family houses of the same area into three-households of the two households in a total of 7 households.

(b) Where any person intends to extend a building with a total floor area of not more than 85§³, he/she shall report it to the competent administrative agency;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without filing a report, removed a steel-fixed bridge from the third floor to the rooftop floor of the building mentioned in the above paragraph (a) during the period specified in the above paragraph (a), and extended one household of a building with a floor area of 71.52 square meters by installing a entrance from the third floor to the fourth floor, which is going up from the third floor to the fourth floor.

2. No person who violates the Parking Lot Act shall build or install any facilities without establishing an annexed parking lot, in violation of the provisions of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not establish a 0.7 parking lot for each household, which was added due to large-scale repair, even though it is necessary to install a 0.7 parking lot for each household in the process of repairing the apartment house for two households, such as the date and time of the above 1-A, 1-A, and 2-B, at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An investigation report (a statement of witness by public official in charge);

arrow