Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years, for six months, and for four months, for defendant C, respectively.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sent a postal item containing a e-mail card from the name “F,” which is the body card, or confirmed whether to suspend the use of the e-mail card by directly delivering the e-mail card from the account holders; and (b) obtained an order from the account holders to receive payment of KRW 12-50,000 per day to deposit the money into a financial account designated by withdrawing the money; and (c) recruited to act as a liability for withdrawing criminal proceeds of the e-mail organization.

On July 2018, 2018, hereinafter referred to as "the employee of the lending company would provide low interest loans when he/she redeems existing loans."

“The phrase “ was false.”

The fact was that the lending company was not an employee of the lending company, and even if the lending company received a loan under the name of the victim, there was no intention to repay the existing loan.

Accordingly, from the victim on August 1, 2018, 5,892,00 won, i.e., a bank account (I) in the name of H around August 1, 2018;

8.2. Post Office Accounts (K) in the name of the GJ 980,000 won;

8.3. 11:300,000 won by a new bank account (M) in the name of L, and 2,380,000 won by a KB national bank account (O) in the name of N around 17:01 on the same day;

8.6. Around January 1, 200 4,100,000 won in a new bank account in the name of P;

8.9. Around January 1, 200, a sum of KRW 15,452,00,000 in the IBK account (S) in the name of R, as well as KRW 100,00.

Accordingly, the Defendant received an order from the phishing staff to withdraw the above money, and withdrawn KRW 5,895,400 by using the physical card and password connected to the new bank account in the above H’s name at the KEB branch in the KEB bank around August 1, 2018.

After all, the Defendant, in collusion with the singishing staff, received money from 15,452,00 won from the victim.

The Defendant, in collusion with the Defendant’s name-free singing staff, in addition to this, in such a manner as above.