beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On August 22, 2018, the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the name in the order of the victim to transfer money to the account directed by the victim by misrepresenting the staff of the public prosecutor's office or misrepresenting the staff of the public prosecutor's office. On August 22, 2018, the defendant received money from the above name in the name in the name in the order of the person in the name in the name in the name in the order to transfer money to the account directed by the person in the name in the name in the order
1. On September 10, 2018, the name influencing organization for aiding and abetting fraud to the victim B, who was not the victim’s name influcing organization, misrepresented the staff of the prosecutor’s office by advertising the phone phone from the victim B to the mobile phone at a non-flucing location, and falsely called “transfer of money held in the bank by the victim’s account was connected to the crime of the financial fraud group, so the victim’s account was involved in the crime of the financial fraud group,” and the victim transferred KRW 6,200,000 to the D bank account (E) in the name of C around 12:46
The Defendant received 6.2 million won from C on the street in the vicinity of D branch offices located in Gwangju Nam-gu, Gwangju, at around 13:15 on the same day, according to the direction of the person without his name, and then deposited H bank account in the G name, excluding 200,000 won and 6.2 million won, to inform the person without name of the name.
Accordingly, the defendant could easily commit the crime of fraud of a person without a name, and prevented it.
2. On September 10:44, 2018, the name influor of the cause of fraud aiding and abetting the victim J from fraud, misrepresenting that the victim was K bank staff by calls to the victim J at a non-fluorous location, and falsely misrepresenting that the victim “it is possible to make an additional loan if the existing loan is repaid” to the victim, thereby allowing the victim to transfer KRW 5 million to the D bank account (E) in the name of C at around 14:30 on the same day.
The defendant is a state of sing.