logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.09.07 2016고단2235
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:10 on January 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) went to the store and corridor of “E” on the second floor of the said building while drinking in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D Building; (b) went to the house, and (c) took the receipt of the said E employee’s 112 report and sent to the house, and (d) G police officers belonging to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, the police officers assigned to the F District Unit of the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station, who called “Iskh to go back” and Hash to go back on the side of the Defendant, while taking the Hasbbbbbbbbs on the front side of the Defendant, “Isn to go to the said police officers who ask their guardians’ contact address or place of residence,” and “Isk to go back to the first floor and second floor, I do not go to the said police officers.”

The defendant who arrived at the second floor parking lot above the above G does not answer the above G while making two streets and residence anywhere. The defendant sent off the elevator with the police officer in charge of the damage who tried to hand over the elevator to the plaintiff and his guardian at the closed building, together with the police officer in charge of the damage who opened the first floor of the elevator, and then cancelled the first floor server of the elevator, the above G takes over several floors, and the above G takes over a variety of floors, with the wheels of the above G's own hand hand hand hand hand hand, and the above G saw the above G again from the above G to the above person who was removed from the above G, with the desire of "new hand," and the other hand, etc. of his own hand hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and G;

1. Each police statement related to H and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Details of 112 reported cases;

1. Application of elevatorCCTV image Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

arrow