beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty.
Reasons
1. Defendant A was the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of D buildings. Defendant B, as Defendant A’s wife, was jointly carried out by the Defendants, and around September 24, 2013, around 70:40, around September 24, 2013, Defendant B led the amendment of “management rules” to strengthen the responsibilities of the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives, etc. on the ground that the victim E (the age of 66) from the front corridor 7:06 of the 7th floor of D building in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, led the victim E to the amendment of “management rules” to strengthen the responsibilities of the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives, and did not receive consent from the occupants. Defendant B saw the victim’s grandchildren and chest by drinking the victim’s hand, etc., and Defendant B sawed the victim’s hand,
2. Determination
A. The Defendants consistently denied the instant charges by asserting that they did not drink the victim or that they did not have a black with a hand-to-saw, etc., in line with the police from the police to this court.
B. Therefore, there are health examinations as to whether the Defendants jointly injured the victim, and as to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor to prove the guilty of the facts charged in the instant case, such as witnesses E, F, G, and H investigative agencies and their respective statements in this court, and written statements, injury diagnosis reports, etc. prepared by the said witnesses.
(1) First, each of the statements made by the victim E, witness F, G, and H is difficult to believe for the following reasons.
① At the time of the police investigation, when the victim E visited 707 in order to obtain a written consent to the amendment of the management rules, the Defendants were intending to walk as witness F, and the Defendants expressed that Defendant A expressed “I would like to go to the residents of this dogb dyp and dyp,” and forced the victim to go against the consent to the amendment of the management rules that he had, “I would like to go to the residents of this dogb dyp hyp,” and Defendant B attempted to go to go to go to the victim by hand, and Defendant B was fryd with the victim’s hand hyp, and Defendant A was fryd with the victim’s right trade part of the victim’s right hyp with the victim’s upper part.