Text
1. Each part of the judgment of the first instance against the defendant shall be revoked;
2. The plaintiffs' claim corresponding to the above revocation part.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive vehicle insurance contract with respect to F vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “F vehicle 1”), G vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “H vehicle 2”), H vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “H vehicle 3”), I vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “H vehicle 4”), J vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “W vehicle 5”), respectively.
B. 1) On April 28, 201, K is a passenger car owned by the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) that was parked in the front parking lot of 107-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) while driving one string vehicle at the front parking lot of 107-dong, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.
2) The instant accident was shocked (hereinafter referred to as “Class 1 accident”).
2) The Plaintiff A suffered damages equivalent to KRW 2,497,850, such as the repair cost, such as the exchange of forward 1 accident, the front, the right-hand scam, etc., of the Plaintiff A’s members.
C. 1) N is while driving 2 Lives Vehicle on the front side of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government O on January 7, 2012, at around 12:50, N is the Plaintiff’s Pkex Car (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”).
2) The term “second accident” (hereinafter referred to as “second accident”)
(2) The Plaintiff B suffered damages equivalent to KRW 3,507,90 in repairing costs, such as the forward right-hand pents, and the forward pan-cirs exchange, due to the second accident. D.
1) On May 30, 2012, Plaintiff C is a passenger car owned by Plaintiff C with Qacksing Qacks, around 23:45 (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”)
(2) While driving the vehicle and driving the apartment in front of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “third-accident”), he saw the vehicle in front of the apartment (hereinafter “third-accident”).
2) The Plaintiff C has suffered damages equivalent to KRW 8,465,50,00 for repair, such as the forward right-hand pent, the subsequent right-hand pent, the subsequent right-hand gate exchange, and the right-hand pent, due to the third accident.
E. (1) On September 29, 2013, Plaintiff D is the Plaintiff’s cracked car (hereinafter “Plaintiff D”) owned by himself on September 29, 2013.
2) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle in the direction of U-House in T, the collisioned with 4 U-rayed Lives (hereinafter “No. 4 accident”).
(2) The Plaintiff D vehicle is forward of the fourth accident, and the front part and right side of the fourth accident.