Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. All plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
3. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive vehicle insurance policy with respect to vehicles with number not exceeding E (hereinafter referred to as “vehicle 1”), vehicles with number not exceeding F (hereinafter referred to as “seaing vehicle 2”), and vehicles with number not exceeding G (hereinafter referred to as “seaing vehicle 3”).
B. 1) On June 25, 2013, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B’s HCM5 car (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) around 15:10 on June 25, 2013
2) The age tunnel in the Taesung-ri, Tae-ri, Tae-ri, Tae-ri, who was driven by the driver of the public vehicle, was inferred by one of the sea-going vehicles (hereinafter referred to as the “first accident”).
2) The Plaintiff A’s vehicle suffered damages equivalent to KRW 7,089,719, such as the exchange of the front paner, the exchange of the Raber, the exchange of the back penter, the latter penter, the latter penter, the latter penter exchange, the latter penter exchange, the latter penter exchange, the latter penter penter exchange, the latter penter penter penter exchange, the biter Sweden Shebden exchange, and the Rabter exchange, etc.
B. 1) The Plaintiff C is the Plaintiff’s Plaintiff-owned I rocketing car (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”)
2) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle and driving a three-dimensional distance on the Cheongdo-dong Cheongdo-dong Cheongdo-dong, the vehicle was inferred by 2 of the GaW-dong (hereinafter referred to as "second accident").
2) The Plaintiff C’s vehicle suffered damages equivalent to KRW 4,655,933, such as the exchange of pans, the exchange of trokes, the exchange of set-off panels, the subsequent exchange of trokes, the subsequent exchange of trokes, the lower left and right side plates, the subsequent exchange of trokes, the exchange of trokes, and the exchange of trokes floor panels.
C. 1) Plaintiff D is a self-owned passenger vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff D”).
) While driving the vehicle and driving the Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, the vehicle was concealed by three Lives (hereinafter referred to as “third accident”).
2) The Plaintiff D’s vehicle is a member of the front part of the instant accident, a D’s exchange, a D’s exchange, a net exchange, the front left part of the instant accident, and the front left and left part of the instant accident;