beta
Text
1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;
2. All plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
3. The plaintiffs' total costs of litigation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance policy with respect to the J Vehicle 1 (hereinafter “AR 1”), K Vehicle 2 (hereinafter “AR 2”), L Vehicle 3 (hereinafter “AR 3”), M Vehicle 4 (hereinafter “AR 4”), N Vehicle 5 (hereinafter “AR 5”), and O Vehicle 6 (hereinafter “AR 6”).
B. 1) On May 16, 2013, Plaintiff A is a passenger car with the highest PP (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”) owned by Plaintiff A around 08:20.
2) While driving the vehicle and driving the vehicle in the direction of the station located in Q in Suwon-si Q, the vehicle was excavated to 1 of the sea-going vehicle (hereinafter “Class 1 accident”).
2) The Plaintiff A incurred loss equivalent to KRW 2,572,346, in repairing costs, such as the front right, the rear replacement, and the scopic plate, due to the Plaintiff A’s accident.
C. (1) On February 12, 2013, Plaintiff B is a passenger car owned by the principal (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”) around 03:00 on February 12, 2013.
2) While driving a vehicle and driving a village in the Guri-si, the 2nd Kari-si was killed in the Guri-si. (hereinafter referred to as “the second accident”).
(ii) the vehicles of Plaintiff B suffered damages equivalent to KRW 1,510,300, for repair costs, such as the subsequent panel and pentar exchange, and tamper floor panel board, due to the second accident;
1) On July 19, 2013, Plaintiff C is a passenger car owned by the Party C (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”) around 20:55.
3) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle on the Annyang-gu 8-dong external cycle expressway at the Annyang-si, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, the vehicle was inferred to 3 (hereinafter “third-party accident”).
2) The Plaintiff C shall have suffered damages equivalent to KRW 4,874,601 in repairing costs, such as the exchange of the forward panel, the forward unit, the right-hand scam, the rear scam, the right-hand scam, and the exchange of tweet floor panel.
E. 1) On July 8, 2013, Plaintiff D is an U.M.-5 car (hereinafter “Plaintiff D”) owned jointly with Plaintiff E on July 8, 2013.
The access road to the petition shall be in progress on the south of the Chungcheongnambuk-gun by driving.