logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.01.21 2015고단1343
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for six months, and for four months, for Defendant C, respectively.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From October 15, 1997, from around October 15, 1997, "BMW Korea" officially with "BMW Korea" company (a business that operates both sale and repair together), "G where the vehicle involved in an accident occurs while serving at a low-level shop, it first confirms the damaged part of the vehicle involved in the accident and calculates the approximate repair details and expenses, and then requests the person in charge of the insurance company involved in the accident to provide payment guarantee. If the vehicle is provided with payment guarantee from the person in charge of the insurance company, it requests the vehicle mechanic to repair the vehicle. Upon completion of the repair of the vehicle, it was in charge of the insurance company to verify the exact repair details, and then claims the repair cost from July 3, 2009; Defendant C from June 19, 2008 to September 30, 2013.

In order to increase sales of the above center, the Defendants prepared a quotation as if they exchanged any part that has not been actually exchanged, or prepared a quotation as if they exchanged any part of the low-price, and intended to claim insurance money in accordance with it.

1. Defendant A

A. On January 7, 2010, the Defendant, as if he exchanged non-exchanged parts, by deceiving the victim by claiming insurance money, entered the same falsely as if he exchanged the “Deal Management Syms” in the above “Deal Syms” in the “G” located in the Busan J., Busan, and the “G” in the “G” located in the Busan, J., and I BMW 528I car suffering from the accident, and did not exchange the “Sympiu” equivalent to the market price of 223,190 won (including the added tax), but received from the victim company to pay for the above parts in the name of the same as the price for the above parts. Accordingly, the Defendant deceivings the victim using the method of claiming insurance proceeds from Hyundai Commercial Type Insurance Co., Ltd. on the same day from the victim company, and thereby, deceiving the victim by receiving 223,190 won (including the added tax) from the same person.

arrow