logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.11.01 2016가단12652
위자료등
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from February 12, 2016 to November 1, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a professor of the social welfare of D University operated by the school foundation C, and the defendant is the same department student.

B. Around July 14, 2014, the Plaintiff received notice of dismissal from a school juristic person C to inform the Plaintiff that he/she was dismissed as of July 11, 2014 by refusing to resume the contract, despite the expiration of the employment contract on February 28, 2014.

The Plaintiff filed a petition for revocation with the Appeal Committee for Teachers, and the Appeal Committee for Teachers revoked the dismissal on September 25, 2014.

C. On the other hand, around September 2014, the Defendant sent text messages showing the following false facts while holding D University Social Welfare and Students E, F and Kakakao Grouping:

(hereinafter “instant tort”). “A Professor is a part of the work that a professor intends to enter the school by submitting a student’s written application to the faculty council with the student’s written application.”

It is difficult to say that he or she is fluoringly fluorly, and he or she is hearing.

(c) The delivery of evidence with respect to students' tuition benefits or points, upon receipt of applications for carbon;

D. The Defendant was charged with summary order of KRW 2,00,000 on February 1, 2016, as a crime of violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Defamation) and was charged with summary order of KRW 2,00,000, Busan District Court by approximately 2015 High Court

E. The Plaintiff was reinstated on September 1, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, No. 1, and No. 1, and the inquiry results about No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts of recognition of damages liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages incurred by the tort of this case.

Meanwhile, since the Defendant spreads false facts to the social welfare of D University and students from the end of June 2014, or submitted a petition to the chief of a school foundation and the president of a university to cause the Plaintiff to be dismissed unfairly, the Plaintiff is liable to compensate for damages incurred therefrom.

arrow