logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.10.19 2018가합103401
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs the amount of money stated in the corresponding column of "damage" in attached Form 1 and the same Table.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 2002, the Defendant established an implementation plan for a small river maintenance project (G) on May 2002 and December 2004 at the scheduled date for completion of the small river maintenance project pursuant to Article 8 of the Small River Maintenance Act (hereinafter “previous project”).

(i) each of the following land within the project zone (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant land”), and the individual land is specified only once;

() After completing a compensation consultation with Plaintiff A, B, and H as follows, the owner of each of the instant land was completed on February 21, 2003 through March 26, 2003, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Defendant’s future on the grounds of a consultation on public land acquisition. The number of land under the name of Plaintiff A J J 77 square meters is divided into the number of 774 square meters and 3 square meters in JJ on June 8, 2015 as evidence on the date of the registration of ownership transfer on the compensation date for the land under the name of Plaintiff A J J 77 square meters. As seen earlier, it is reasonable to view that a repurchase right has already been completed at the time of the public announcement of approval of the instant project implementation plan on the said land (on July 5, 2012) and the period of exercise of the repurchase right has expired on the said land after the lapse of ten years from the date of the registration of ownership transfer (on February 27, 2013).

[] Since all land was divided, the determination of whether a repurchase right occurs, the amount of damages, etc. is made on the basis of the land before subdivision. On February 27, 2003, the determination of whether a repurchase right occurs, the amount of damages, etc. is made on the basis of the land before subdivision. On February 27, 2003, on February 27, 2003, as seen in Section 12,47,500 square meters per 155 square meters per K-1, K on February 26, 2003, A1-22, Plaintiff B, on February 27, 2003, was divided into 408 square meters per L, U. 11 square meters on June 8, 2015, on the basis of the land before subdivision, the determination of whether a repurchase right occurs, damages, etc. are made or not, on the basis of the land before subdivision.

On March 25, 2003, on March 25, 2003, A1-3 M on March 26, 2003: (a) on March 26, 2003, on March 25, 2003, on the land of KRW 5,635,000, on March 25, 2003, on the land of KRW 726, A1-43 H NN 3, on March 26, 2003, the land was divided into KRW 715,00,000 and KRW 726,00,000, on June 8, 2015; and (b) on each of the said Section 1.

arrow