1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The plaintiffs' assertion

A. Under the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Acquisition of Land for Public Use and the Compensation for Loss in order to implement C and D Road Packing Project (hereinafter “Road Project”), the Defendant purchased each land indicated in the “acquisition Land” column owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and paid compensation to the Plaintiffs, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for each land of this case based on consultation on public land in the future of the Defendant.

The owner of the land acquired by the sequence Nos. 45,748,500 [the list of the acquisition of real estate] August 20, 1997 / [the list of the acquisition of real estate] Plaintiff AF 33,675,000 square meters for 433,675,000 square meters for 45,748,500 square meters for Plaintiff B G G on December 26, 1997

B. On June 28, 2002, pursuant to Articles 3 and 7 of the Housing Site Development Promotion Act, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated Sungnam-gu E, Sungnam-gu, H, 79,000 square meters as a planned housing site development area, and designated the Korea National Housing Corporation (the Korea Land and Housing Corporation was merged with the Korea Land and Housing Corporation on October 1, 2009 and became the Korea Land and Housing Corporation; hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Korea Land and Housing Corporation”) as a project implementer of the said housing site development (hereinafter referred to as the “instant housing site development”). On June 20, 203, the Minister approved and publicly notified the instant housing site development plan on November 28, 2003, the designation and alteration of the planned housing site development area, the approval and alteration of the housing site development plan, and the implementation plan.

C. On November 28, 2003, the road project of this case was abolished or changed in accordance with the approval of the alteration plan of the housing site development plan of this case as of November 28, 2003, and since each land of this case was no longer necessary for the road project of this case, a repurchase right of this case was created to the plaintiffs on November 28, 2003.

(Preliminaryly, the instant road development project occurred due to the destruction of the instant road around 2006. However, the Defendant’s duty to notify the repurchase right.