A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:30 on May 16, 2020, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim D (the age of 57) who is a bus engineer used a bus and told the Defendant to board the bus, who is a passenger; (b) stated that “the victim D, who was a bus engineer, was able to board the bus,” and reported the victim D to 112 on the bus; and (c) stated that “the victim D, who was able to escape, was able to fright the face and head of the victim; and (d) stated that the victim D, who was at the end of the fighting in question, was able to use the fighting in the bus; and (e) reported the victim D’s clothes 112 on the bus; and (e) when the victim’s clothes of the Defendant, who was fighting in question, was able to use the victim’s face and head at a time.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of on-site photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes concerning damaged parts;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the Defendant assaulted a bus engineer using Mascke and assaulted against the passengers to speak it, and the nature of the offense is not bad in light of the circumstances of the assault.

Comprehensively taking into account the degree of violence, age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, all the sentencing conditions shall be determined as ordered by the defendant.