Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 50,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, around December 26, 2013, at the Seongdong-gu Seoul apartment management office, around 08:45 on December 26, 2013, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim B (the age of 53) who was the chief of the management office, on the ground that the Defendant did not properly report the leakage of the Rady water in the management office to the victim B (the age of 53) who was the chief of the management office, on the ground that he did not properly report the leakage of the Rady water in the management office, on the part of raising the victim’s speech with the victim, and caused the victim’s bather face on one occasion at the victim’s bat and on one occasion,

2. Defendant B, at the same time, and at the same place, assaulted the victim during the dispute with the victim A (the age of 66) on the same reason, such as raising drinking water to the victim, breading the victim’s breath by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement, Defendant A’s partial legal statement

1. Each legal statement of witness B and F;

1. Defendant B’s statements and part of Defendant A’s protocol of interrogation of the Defendants in the prosecution as to the Defendants

1. A medical certificate of injury and a written opinion;

1. Bodily damaged photo;

1. A copy of medical records;

1. The written agreement [Defendant A] asserts to the effect that he was flabing and flabing him with flabbing, and that he did not have any flabing on the face of Defendant B, the upper part of the Defendant B seems to have been flabing the Defendant A. However, the Defendant B consistently stated that the face of the Defendant A was met, and the witness F stated that he was flabing from the eye of the Defendant B while he was removed from the flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flab, contrary to the allegations of the Defendant A. This means that the two persons were flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flabing on the flab of the Defendant B (the Defendant asserted that he was flabed on the flabing on the flab.