(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.06.01 2018고단98

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.06.01 2018고단98

상해

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 6 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 23:20, at E’s house, the Defendant, the seat of the Defendant located in Newanananan-gun, Nanananananan-gun, and (b) at the time of drinking alcohol together with the Victim B (56). As a result, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the Defendant, by hand, on the part of the Victim, such as fat, which had no wife in two open areas where the Victim’s face needs to be treated for about two weeks.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, was in dispute with the victim A (62) as above, and the victim’s face was spawned with spawn, and spawned with the victim’s spath, and spawned with the victim’s face one time, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as a spawn for approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of Defendant A and some of Defendant B’s legal statement

1. A legal statement of a witness;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Voluntary accompanying reports, investigation reports, photographs of damaged parts, investigation reports (Submission of suspect A written agreement), investigation reports (Submission of suspect B diagnosis reports) [Defendant B and his defense counsel asserts that Defendant B did not have the victim victim A as the victim's main disease.

In full view of the following circumstances that can be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the above evidence: (a) the victim A consistently stated at the investigative agency to this court that “A was caused by the disease of the victim; (b) the victim’s photo conforms to the above statement; (c) the victim A paid KRW 2 million to the victim; and (d) the prosecutor’s office recognized the victim A to be exposed to the disease of the victim at the time of investigation; and (e) the fact that the victim A was exposed to the disease of the victim, such as paragraph (2) of the judgment by the defendant B, can be sufficiently recognized.

Defendant

B and its defense counsel’s above assertion is difficult to accept.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A:

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2016.09.20 2016고단2021

-인천지방법원 2015.08.19 2015고단699

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2011.11.16 2011고정158

-대전지방법원 2019.01.10 2018노1920

-부산지방법원 2013.05.22 2012고단4888