The judgment below

The parts against the Defendants are reversed.

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of three million won or more, and Defendant B.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not constitute a threat to the victims as stated in Paragraph 1 of the crime at the time of the original adjudication, and there is no fact that the Defendants inflicted an injury on the victim K as stated in Paragraph 2 of the original adjudication.

Nevertheless, the court below convicted the Defendants, which is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below on the violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint intimidation) stated that the victim J was investigated by the police, namely, the following circumstances that can be recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, and that "the victim J was found to be a company run by the defendant A on November 28, 2011, and that "the defendant A would have been able to take her responsibility because she would have moved out of the lane or she would have died after being stamped as she was stamped." The above 2 male members of the court below stated that "the defendant 1 would not leave the front co-defendant C, and D," and that "the defendant 2 and the defendant 1 should not look at the 3rd co-defendant and K at the 10th co-defendant's family members," and that "the defendant 2 and the defendant 3 should not be able to see the 10th co-defendant and the defendant 1, 2019."

Defendant

A referred to as “a young young friendlys (C and D)” as “a container affixed to an internal responsibility for the container as a c or D,” which read “a container affixed to the young friendlys (C or D).

당시 D은 문짝을 발로 걷어 찼고, C은 안으로 들어와서 배로 본인을 밀치고 문을 발로 찼다.

D. D.