The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at Suwon District Court on June 8, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence at Suwon Detention House on June 9, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

On April 27, 2008, the Defendant told C’s wife D to the effect that “F” restaurant of the operation of Suwon-si C in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, “F will reverse the wooden statement and make a signature on the prepared document and take a measure of accusation against the construction of the Gu office and the Gu office”. The Defendant stated that “F will reverse the wooden statement and sign it on the prepared document.”

5.3 The above restaurant stated to the effect that "the defendant, although he saw to a police officer, he / she did not take any desire because he / she did not take any desire." The above restaurant stated to the effect that "the witness did not take any desire."

5.9. In the above restaurant, the above restaurant stated to the effect that “I reverse their statements and satisfing them. I shall have died. I will report to the Gu Office.”

5. At around 14:00, the above restaurant stated to the effect that “If we reverse the statement of a case related to a police officer, we will help funeral and will not report it to the Gu office” and that “I will not report it to the Gu office.”

5. At around 23:00, at the end of 15:23:0, the above restaurant referred to the purport that “no one shall exist, and no one shall be discarded, and no one shall be discarded until the end of the police officer G clothes called up at that time.”

C On May 15, 2008, the above acts of the defendant were directly observed at around 14:00 of the above acts of the defendant, and the remaining acts were transferred from D, and reported to the police on behalf of D, the above acts of the defendant.

5. Around 17. Around the H district of the Suwon Police Station, the Defendant was investigated as a victim, and the completion of all of the Defendant’s above acts was made as if he was threatened by C himself, and thereafter, the Defendant was directly present at the investigative agency and the Defendant’s act around 14:00 in the criminal law of the case without prejudice, and the rest of the act was consistently stated as D.