logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.06.11 2014고정1530
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products under charges or the processed products thereof shall not make a false indication of the place of origin or attach a mark likely to cause confusion as to such products.

Nevertheless, from February 1, 2013 to March 24, 2014, the Defendant purchased Thailand or 46 km of Denmark C while working as a kitchen in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si and managing food materials, and sold 42.8 km to sping off and sprink, after cooking 42.8 km in order to refry, and indicating the country of origin of chill in the Quamark as domestic origin.

Judgment

Unlike the statement in the investigative agency, the defendant asserts that he did not make a false indication of origin in this court.

According to the results of this court's adoption and investigation as evidence, the following facts or circumstances are revealed.

A person whose country of origin is indicated as “wecker - home” in the Qua New Market is not the head of the household, but the defendant.

(E) A witness E and F, and G testified that the country of origin was marked in accordance with the Defendant’s confirmation of origin. However, in light of the fact that, rather than indicating the country of origin for each Meap, the materials are indicated in a lump sum on the materials “Korea” and that there was a Mega Newcom used as the presiding official fee even before the Defendant entered around February 1, 2013 (the witness F and E testified that only used the domestic chickens before the Defendant entered) and that there was an indication of origin in the same manner as above even before the Defendant entered (the witness F and E testified that only used the domestic chickens before the Defendant entered). As such, the Defendant appears to have been indicated in the same manner as above, the Defendant’s confirmation of the country of origin does not seem to have been indicated as “in Korea.”

In addition to the defendant, the defendant was employed as a cook in the main station, and the present main station is located.

arrow