The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: (a) the witness F, E, and G’s statements and the Defendant worked as the main kitchen twice or more; (b) in the process, the entire changes in the name of food, food materials, and the origin of the food materials and food materials were prepared based on the Defendant’s guidance; (c) prior to the instant case, there cannot be grounds for innocence that there were mecherbs included in mechers, and (d) the witness H testified testified that he/she was in charge of the management of mechers and indicating the origin; (b) the meaning of the above fact-finding means that he/she carries out the production, mechering through “Mechers” through “Mechering the Defendant’s name and place of origin to the customers of the said mechers; and (c) the Defendant was aware of the origin of food materials supplied by the Agricultural Product Quality Control Board and made a statement directly indicating the origin; and (d) the Defendant was found to have any errors in the judgment of the court below.

2. Determination

A. A person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking the summary of the facts charged in the instant case shall not make a false indication of the country of origin or make a false indication that may cause confusion as to such products;

Nevertheless, from February 1, 2013 to March 24, 2014, the Defendant purchased Thailand or 46 km of Denmark C while working as a kitchen in Ulsan-si, Ulsan-si and managing food materials, and sold 42.8 km to sping off and sprink, after cooking 42.8 km in order to refry, and indicating the country of origin of chill in the Quamark as domestic origin.

B. The judgment of the court below.