1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 50,000,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 25% per annum from November 24, 2016 to February 7, 2018.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant borrowed KRW 50 million from the Plaintiff at an annual interest rate of 25% on November 23, 2016.

“A certificate of borrowing is drawn up and drawn up.”

According to the above facts of recognition, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 24% per annum, which is the highest interest rate prescribed by the Interest Limitation Act, from November 24, 2016 to February 7, 2018, which is the day following the date of the above agreement, and from February 24, 2016 to February 7, 2018.

2. On the judgment of the defendant's defense of repayment, the defendant asserts that the defendant actually borrowed the money stated in the above loan certificate, and that the defendant's outer village C paid the plaintiff a total of KRW 34.1 million.

However, the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to admit the defendant's assertion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The defendant's defense is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.