logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.09.26 2013가단36989
건물명도, 토지인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the 664 square meters prior to Guri-si, attached appraisal marks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 shall be in order.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 4, 2010, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the land of 664 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. From November 9, 2009 to the date of closing the argument in the instant case, the Defendant occupied and used the instant land by installing three vinyl houses on the ground of the part 30 square meters of “B” and the attached appraisal map in sequence 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the attached Table No. 39 square meters and the attached sheet No. 9,10, 11, 12, and 9, connected each point of “B” in sequence 39 square meters and the attached sheet No. 9, 10, 7, 8, and 5, which connected each point in sequence, among the instant land from November 9, 200 to the date of closing the argument in the instant case.

C. Meanwhile, the sum of rent for the instant land from the date the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant land to December 31, 2012 is KRW 6,342,830, and thereafter, the rent from the date of the Plaintiff’s acquisition to December 31, 2012 is KRW 204,680 per month.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 3, result of on-site inspection by this court, result of survey and appraisal of appraiser D, result of appraisal of rent for appraiser E by this court, purport of whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant, as the owner of the instant land, has a duty to remove three of the said vinyls installed on the instant land, and at the same time collect all of the movables, such as flowers located in the said vinyls, unless he/she proves that he/she has a legitimate title to possess the instant land, and is also obligated to deliver the instant land.

Furthermore, from June 4, 2010 to December 31, 2012, the Defendant asserts to the Plaintiff as to the existence and scope of the obligation of the Defendant from July 30, 2013, the following day after the delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case.

arrow